Hisar. With the 2029 Haryana Assembly poll drawing closer, the state Congress is once again tangled in a debate over who should steer a prospective government.
Senior figure cautions against premature CM nomination
Former Assembly Speaker Kuldeep Sharma has penned a formal note to the party’s state hierarchy, urging the Congress not to crown a chief‑ministerial candidate before the electorate casts its votes. He argues that the party’s strength lies in a collective front rather than rallying around a single personality.
Risks of spotlighting a lone leader
In his letter addressed to Haryana Congress in‑charge Sanjay Dutt and other senior functionaries, Sharma references a recent comment by Sachin Pilot that stresses anchoring the campaign on Rahul Gandhi and a broader organisational vision.
Sharma highlights that Haryana’s voter base is deeply divided along caste, community and regional lines. Elevating one individual too early, he warns, could shrink the party’s outreach and ignite internal friction.
Dipender Singh Hooda’s name surfaces
The correspondence also flags Dipender Singh Hooda, stoking speculation about his ambitions for the chief‑ministerial berth.
According to Sharma, pushing Hooda as the definitive CM contender for 2029 might marginalise other senior figures and strain Congress’s ties with various community blocs, intensifying intra‑party rivalry.
Advocating a collective, policy‑centric campaign
Instead of fixing the leadership question now, Sharma proposes that the party concentrate on strengthening its organisational foundation and crafting a solid electoral blueprint.
He envisions a campaign built on Congress’s shared leadership, policy agenda, and grassroots network, leaving the CM decision to be taken post‑election—with newly elected MLAs offering input and the central command giving final assent.
Internal divisions resurface
Sharma’s missive has thrust the leadership dilemma back into the spotlight, exposing divergent viewpoints within Haryana Congress even though the 2029 polls are still years away.
This development poses a fundamental strategic query for the party: should it centre its next contest around a charismatic individual or present itself as a cohesive organization under collective stewardship?



